THE TWO GREAT AMERICAN MYTHOLOGIES

pi_pk1sm Every myth has its own scope or scale. Myths of the smallest scale deal with very specific people, places, and events; for example, the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock, or Rosa Parks refusing the bus driver’s command to vacate her seat. But every such small-scale myth is part of one or (more often) several larger-scale myths, which are in turn parts of ever larger myths, creating an interlocking web of hierarchies. For example, the Mayflower’s landing (and the Rock itself) are part of the Pilgrim myth, which is in turn part of the Puritan myth, which becomes part of a series of larger-scale myths: religious freedom, New England, the self-sufficient farmer, group heroism, conflict with the native peoples, democracy, the frontier, the Kingdom of God on earth, etc. Rosa Parks’ refusal is part of the Montgomery bus boycott myth, which is in turn part of the civil rights myth, which becomes part of another series of larger-scale myths: Martin Luther King, Jr., racism and resistance to it, nonviolent resistance, the South, individual and group heroism, democracy, human rights, etc.

Myths at the highest level — those that are broadest and most all-encompassing — are actually complex structures combining many elements of many myths. These can conveniently be called mythologies. The most all-encompassing mythology of American culture, past and present, is probably the mythology of freedom: America as the land of the free, the sweet land of liberty, where from every mountainside freedom rings.

Precisely because this mythology embraces virtually all others, it cannot be understood except by studying its component parts. But it contains so many small, medium, and large-scale myths, overlapping and interacting in so many ways, that — like an ecosystem — it would be impossible ever to trace, chart, and analyze them all. In studying them, we pick and choose among them the ones that are most important to us; each of us will have our own criteria.

In my own study I have focused on two mythologies that seem to have the most potent effect in shaping American public life, especially political life, in the present. To emphasize their contemporary relevance, I call them the mythology of “hope and change” and the mythology of “homeland insecurity.”  I call them “great” not to praise them — in fact, there is plenty of reason to criticize them — but to mark the immensity of their presence and influence on the cultural landscape.  They offer two fundamental ways of interpreting the meaning of freedom; they may be ranked just below the mythology of freedom itself in the hierarchy of American mythologies.

In the following essays I describe the most elementary features and skeletal structures of each of these two mythologies, and then sketch out some of their basic interactions in historical perspective. To fill in all the details would take a scholarly lifetime. (Graduate students, are you listening?).

THE MYTHOLOGY OF HOPE AND CHANGE

THE MYTHOLOGY OF HOMELAND INSECURITY

THE TWO MYTHOLOGIES INTERACTING

5 comments

  1. Professor Chernus,

    Yes, I am a graduate student and I’m definitely listening. Information from your site will be included in an essay about the American political consciousness. My ultimate project is to use Jungian psychology in a way that raises personal self-awareness and progressive political consciousness. I’d love your feedback.

  2. I am familiar with Jungian theory. I’ve chosen not to use it, or any psychological theory, in my work because I do not know the theories well enough. However I certainly encourage people who do know Jungian theory well to apply it to the kinds of things I write about here. It’s great to have people studying the myths underlying American political-cultural life from as many different perspectives as possible. The popularity of Joseph Campbell’s work shows that there are lots of Americans eager for that kind of interpretation. I don’t mean that one should stick strictly to Campbell’s approach. But his success shows that there would be an audience for a variety of interpretations based in Jungian theory. The more people get thinking about American mythology, from whatever perspective, the better!

  3. Professor Chernus,
    Thank you for making your ideas about modern mythology open for discussion. First, however, I wish that you would give us your complete definition of mythology, myth, mythos, mythic and the other related forms of the concept and/or genre of literature. If fact, I will read more of your blog only when I have an assurance about how you define myth in your contexts of Rosa Parks, Reverend King and the civil rights movement. Please give us some of the point you want to make–your actual thesis–rather than mere provocations about people and matters of great importance. On the face of your remarks, I find them offensive–in the Glen Beck vein of shock revisionism. I do, however, concede to your doubts about the European pilgrims, puritans and colonialists in general into the western hemisphere. But, there again, your lack of concise introductory thesis has me guessing.–David Faubion

    1. My definition of myth and related terms is set forth in the essay “The Meaning of ‘Myth’ in the American Context.” There I make it clear that I am not using the word myth in the colloquial sense of a lie or a deception. I’m using it in the way that scholars of religion use it, taking myth seriously as a way that people communicate their deepest sense of what is true and meaningful to them. As my essay on Dr. King shows, when I call him a great myth-maker I mean it as a mark of great respect for his abilities and his influence.
      The overall thesis — or perhaps I should say, more accurately, the motivation — of these essays is that we should pay a lot more attention to the power of myth and mythmaking in the American public arena, especially the political arena, because that will give us a lot more freedom to make informed choice about the direction that we follow together, as Americans, into the future. Beyond that, each essay stands alone and has its own particular thesis.

  4. When you say myth is not a lie i have to cringe and think almost all American mythology IS a lie.. Or maybe more accurate to say a self deception predicated on the birth to death propaganda fed them from parents (also indoctrinated ) teachers (also indoctrinated ) politics (also indoctrinated ) into all the same mythology.(and this is also thousands of years old)..Just because they “believe it” does not make any of it true.
    I suppose you can make the argument that if they believe it than they are not telling a “lie” but i suspect most people KNOW the lie and say it anyway as a means of promoting that lie so that they feel comfortable lying to themselves about the mythology of American exceptional-ism.

    And than when you factor in the formed creation of an identity politic based on these beliefs they are motivated to continue to sell the deception to themselves and others.

    It is Interesting you mention religion in one of your responses to a comment because it is no different than the religious zealot that seem to want to comfort themselves by forcing the world to adopt their doctrine so that this way they are surrounded with like minded folks giving them a sens of security… This security being a false construct due to the false construct of all the LYING that people in power do to keep people scared and afraid of the bogie men they create to keep people afraid and scared and crawling to their leadership… This is why the religious mythology of heaven and hell was actually created as a control mechanism to keep the proletariat in line docile and malleable…
    But today that’s harder to sell because of our growing scientific awareness that makes those old myths harder to sell for smart people..But what seems to keep working is the mythology of tribe pride and nationalism coupled to patriotism and some bigotry thrown in their to keep the passions of fear alight… Flag waving as a gang mentality… people think gang colors only come in bandannas.
    As we have seen the neocons use to great effect to demonize and dehumanize vast swaths of fellow human beings for the agenda of empire expansion and theft of resources around the globe..

    There is a great film out called ” let your life be a friction to stop the machine”
    They go into a lot of the mythology of american exceptional-ism and the DAMAGE that has caused the ENTIRE human condition all over the world and had a blow back effect that has DAMAGED America as well… It would seem that American mythology is its WORST enemy and promoted by people that are too ignorant to see its been self destructive all this LYING!

Leave a Comment Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: